Jump to content

Talk:Yadav

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles on Abhira or Ahir

[edit]

One can refer gamit of articles Yadav_(disambiguation) by various communities including historical, mythological reference, pre-sanskritization, sanskritization, modern, post-indepdence. Good to improve this articles using pre-sanskritization reference for example:

  • A book written long before sanskritisation by James Todd "Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan 1829" [1]

References

  1. ^ James Todd. Tod, James (1829). Annals and Antiquities of Rajast'han or the Central and Western Rajpoot States of India, Volume 1. London: Smith, Elder.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 November 2024

[edit]
Nishantsksbcsn (talk) 17:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Ratnahastin (talk) 17:23, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 6 November 2024

[edit]

change "traditionally non-elite, peasant-pastoral communities" to traditionally agricultural community. As most of the castes identified along with Yadavs like Jat, earlier the page Jat had non elite as well but it is now removed or the other castes like Gujjar which are even considered lower in hierarchy than Ahirs and Jats also do not mention something like this. I think this is the Major problem in this page, seniors edtors may have a look. Refrences [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] Brandon42Paul (talk) 14:50, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Supporting Refrences
Page Number 28 of Government of India Official District Gazetteer of Gurgaon
[8] 2409:4050:2ECD:BEBA:E9F1:C933:AD5F:26E3 (talk) 15:15, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Supporting reference
Martial Races of undivided India by Vidya Prakash Tyagi

your 6th reference is the strongest reason to remove it: "The general OBC category was, in fact, often used by a Yadav elite to promote its interests.".

There is significant opposition backed by evidence, and the burden lies on those seeking to include. 2409:40D0:102A:A1F7:A88E:7C88:C5E0:7D98 (talk) 16:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Please get consensus on the talkpage. Ratnahastin (talk) 17:02, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
as i repeat WP:BURDEN lies on those seeking to include 2409:40D0:2039:C186:E5A6:E7CD:8632:5507 (talk) 08:02, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non elite?

[edit]

The article mentions “non elite” in the header which is derogatory and non representative of existing facts. The grouping that exists today is comprised of mixed representation, both elite and non elites, and terming the whole community or grouping as non elite is somewhat biased and inappropriate presentation. Requesting senior editors to make changes as necessary. 49.43.118.87 (talk) 12:09, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]